Sad life ;( why gretar y

[Feriouse]

:(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((( this pic explains my rng in game n life sad man

EDIT:NEXT DAY AGAIN 

Edited January 28, 2019 by Feriouse

[Fruitiest]

Another example of how gamblers misjudge losing outcomes can be seen when individuals respond to losses that are similar in appearance to a win. Receiving two out of three symbols necessary to win on a slot machine is a loss but players often respond to this “near miss” with excitement, increased betting and more persistent play.

Winning and almost winning are such similar events to many people that they respond in the same way to both. People pause, for example, for longer after a win than a loss. This is known as a “post-reinforcement pause.” People often pause for longer after a near-miss.

Winning and almost winning are so alike in gamblers’ brains that research on the dopamine-transmitting pathways of anticipation and reward show remarkably similar activation patterns for a near-miss and a win.

Near-miss effects are not limited to outcomes that look similar to win. Outcomes that are closer to a win in a more abstract sense also cause a similar response.

[JBLIND]

Sit

[Feriouse]

3 minutes ago, JBLIND said:

Sit

LOL thx

10 minutes ago, Fruitiest said:

Another example of how gamblers misjudge losing outcomes can be seen when individuals respond to losses that are similar in appearance to a win. Receiving two out of three symbols necessary to win on a slot machine is a loss but players often respond to this “near miss” with excitement, increased betting and more persistent play.

Winning and almost winning are such similar events to many people that they respond in the same way to both. People pause, for example, for longer after a win than a loss. This is known as a “post-reinforcement pause.” People often pause for longer after a near-miss.

Winning and almost winning are so alike in gamblers’ brains that research on the dopamine-transmitting pathways of anticipation and reward show remarkably similar activation patterns for a near-miss and a win.

Near-miss effects are not limited to outcomes that look similar to win. Outcomes that are closer to a win in a more abstract sense also cause a similar response.

I understand what your trying to say but I just never got this close to ever getting Infernal Cape and I never ever stake,gamble,because I know what you mean by the addiction to it and ill end up losing bank lol

[Xex]

1 hour ago, Fruitiest said:

Another example of how gamblers misjudge losing outcomes can be seen when individuals respond to losses that are similar in appearance to a win. Receiving two out of three symbols necessary to win on a slot machine is a loss but players often respond to this “near miss” with excitement, increased betting and more persistent play.

Winning and almost winning are such similar events to many people that they respond in the same way to both. People pause, for example, for longer after a win than a loss. This is known as a “post-reinforcement pause.” People often pause for longer after a near-miss.

Winning and almost winning are so alike in gamblers’ brains that research on the dopamine-transmitting pathways of anticipation and reward show remarkably similar activation patterns for a near-miss and a win.

Near-miss effects are not limited to outcomes that look similar to win. Outcomes that are closer to a win in a more abstract sense also cause a similar response.

fruitiest is a psych major confirmed

[Umut]

Tell us Gretar why??

[zeplin99]

i have a very simple answer : GET A LIFE

[Persona]

3 hours ago, Fruitiest said:

Another example of how gamblers misjudge losing outcomes can be seen when individuals respond to losses that are similar in appearance to a win. Receiving two out of three symbols necessary to win on a slot machine is a loss but players often respond to this “near miss” with excitement, increased betting and more persistent play.

Winning and almost winning are such similar events to many people that they respond in the same way to both. People pause, for example, for longer after a win than a loss. This is known as a “post-reinforcement pause.” People often pause for longer after a near-miss.

Winning and almost winning are so alike in gamblers’ brains that research on the dopamine-transmitting pathways of anticipation and reward show remarkably similar activation patterns for a near-miss and a win.

Near-miss effects are not limited to outcomes that look similar to win. Outcomes that are closer to a win in a more abstract sense also cause a similar response.

?...

[Yoeriwada]

8 hours ago, Fruitiest said:

Another example of how gamblers misjudge losing outcomes can be seen when individuals respond to losses that are similar in appearance to a win. Receiving two out of three symbols necessary to win on a slot machine is a loss but players often respond to this “near miss” with excitement, increased betting and more persistent play.

Winning and almost winning are such similar events to many people that they respond in the same way to both. People pause, for example, for longer after a win than a loss. This is known as a “post-reinforcement pause.” People often pause for longer after a near-miss.

Winning and almost winning are so alike in gamblers’ brains that research on the dopamine-transmitting pathways of anticipation and reward show remarkably similar activation patterns for a near-miss and a win.

Near-miss effects are not limited to outcomes that look similar to win. Outcomes that are closer to a win in a more abstract sense also cause a similar response.

Big science facts.

[Feriouse]

lmaooo this post ❤️ fck all yall

WOW GRETAR UR BUSTING MY BALLS JUST GIMME PLSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

[Ban152]

the vote boxes are shit lol ngl